REFER TO AND "CLICK" ON SUBJECTS OF INTEREST - AS LISTED ON SUB-PAGES BELOW UNDER "NEWS UPDATES" FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Alex Glass Wednesday, May 17, 2006 (202) 224-2834 Senate Approves Amendment to Delay Border-Crossing Requirements Legislation co-sponsored by Murray would postpone PASS Card system for 17 months (WASHINGTON, D.C.) – Today the U.S. Senate passed a bipartisan amendment to immigration legislation that would delay implementation of Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI) passport requirements by 17 months. U.S. Senator Patty Murray – who has repeatedly urged the Bush Administration to delay the passport requirements cosponsored the amendment. “I want to make sure that the steps we take will actually improve security with minimal delays and burdens for citizens and commerce,” Senator Murray said. “We need to ensure that federal agencies are prepared to implement this program with minimal disruption to commerce, tourism and travel.” WHTI requires people crossing the border into the United States to show a passport or other approved document starting December 31, 2006 for passengers entering the U.S. by air or sea, and by December 31, 2007 for land border crossings. The amendment which passed the Senate today by voice vote would delay implementation of the PASS card requirements for 17 months, to June 1, 2009. On March 24th, Murray and Representative Rick Larsen hosted a forum in Bellingham with representatives from the Departments of State and Homeland Security to give Northern Border communities the opportunity to express their concerns that the new rules could hurt state commerce without actually improving security. “The most important job of our government is to ensure the safety and security of our citizens. But as we implement this plan, we need to remember that the economy of our border states depends on fluid cross-border travel,” Murray said. “That’s why our federal agencies, local businesses and communities need more time to get this right.” For years, Murray has advocated for increased staffing at the Northern Border. Immediately after September 11th, as a member of the Commerce, Justice, State and Judiciary Subcommittee, Murray helped craft a provision in the Appropriations bill to require at least 25 percent of all new Border Patrol agents and INS inspection staff to go to the Northern Border, and to boost Customs staffing levels by $25 million. ### Opinion Passport plan will hurt U.S., Canada Jim Bradley
Special to The Star
659 words
14 October 2005
The Toronto Star
ONT
A29
English
Copyright (c) 2005 The Toronto Star Unless it gets fixed, by 2008 all Canadians - and all returning American citizens - will need a passport to enter the United States. The authors of the passport requirement were correctly thinking about border security. But their proposal threatens to cause so much unintended economic damage that we should all step back and rethink this idea. Since 9/11, Canadians have shared American concerns about securing North America from terrorist attack, and have been working with the U.S. to make our common border more secure. Ontario officials have met with their counterparts in New York, Michigan and Ohio to confer on border security issues. Canada has allocated $7.7 billion to bolster anti-terrorism efforts, including increasing the number of Integrated Border Enforcement Teams (IBET) from five to 14. IBETs are binational intelligence-driven law enforcement teams that target terrorists, as well as gunrunners and drug smugglers. The question is: What more can be done to help us achieve the secure borders we all want, in a way that encourages the free-flowing two-way traffic that nurtures prosperity and preserves the personal liberty that is so precious to both our nations? We have to get the answer right, because there is much at stake. Only 35 per cent of Canadian residents and 25 per cent of American residents currently hold passports. At a cost of about $100 per passport, the plan would be a major hurdle to cross-border travel, especially for families. We estimate that the proposed policy could suppress American visits to Canada by more than 12 per cent by 2008. In Ontario alone, the potential loss is $570 million U.S. and 7,000 jobs. Even talk of a pending change is proving a strong negative motivator; more Americans stayed home this summer than in past years. Quebec, the Maritimes and British Columbia would also feel the impact on their already shrinking tourism business from south of the border. The American economy has as much to lose from the passport requirement as Canada does. Last year, 35.9 million Canadians visited the U.S. and put $11.7 billion into American tourism industry cash registers. That is $2.1 billion more than Americans spent in Canada that year. The proposed passport barrier would greatly diminish the lucrative traffic of Canadian visitors to border states for everything from Buffalo Bills, Detroit Pistons and Seattle Mariners games, to fine Italian restaurants in Niagara Falls, N.Y., Little League tournaments in Maine, and shopping safaris or sightseeing trips. Parents, coaches and young athletes who participate in amateur sports tournaments, to the benefit of host communities, would also face daunting obstacles to maintaining these friendly cross-border competitions. The passport proposal would have a debilitating impact on golf courses, restaurants, hotels and resorts in tourist spots such as Myrtle Beach, S.C., and the states of Virginia and Florida, where Canadian snowbirds can be the difference between breaking even and making a profit. The risks to all concerned are clear. That is why N.Y. Senator Hillary Clinton called the passport requirement "ill-advised." She stated flatly, "It would be an economic disaster and would disrupt the flow of goods, services and personal relationships across the border." That sums up the problem. What is the solution? Michigan Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land has proposed adapting drivers' licences for border purposes. To its credit, the U.S. homeland security department is willing to discuss the possibility of using alternative secure documents for entry into America. This is where the Ontario government feels it can make a difference, through discussions with elected representatives and industry leaders from both sides of the border. I am confident we can find a secure, yet readily available document that all can carry and continue to enjoy their traditional close ties. Jim Bradley is Ontario's tourism minister. Subject: [washington] 100 percent ID verifications slowing border
> 100 percent ID verifications slowing border
>
> By Meg Olson
> The Northern Light
> July 7, 2005
>
> If things seem to be going a little slower at the border, if the line
coming
> into the United States seems longer than you're used to, you could try
> asking an inspector why. Chances are you'll get a little grumbling about a
> new national policy directing inspectors to check the identification of
> every traveler against national security databases.
>
> "It's stupid," said a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) inspector at the
> Pacific Highway port of entry. "It just slows traffic down when we have to
> process people we know." Some inspectors said they felt enhanced
> identification checks should be up to the individual inspector rather than
> dictated by policy. "We're trained so why don't they leave it to our
> discretion?" said another truck crossing inspector. "Why waste my time on
> you when I should be spending it on suspicious travelers?" All inspectors
> contacted would only discuss the policy they said was put into effect by a
> recent memo, on condition their names not be published. CBP public
> information officer Mike Milne said the contents of the memo announcing
the
> policy change, or even its existence, was "internal policy" and would not
be
> made public.
>
> Tom Hardy, CBP director of field operations for 65 ports of entry on the
> northwest border, told a town hall meeting hosted by Congressman Rick
Larsen
> in Bellingham July 6 "the traveling public has to become a little more
> mature about what is going on at the border. We are not going to simply
> query your license plate and let you into our country. We have to have
some
> reasonable validity you are who you are." He added if people crossing the
> border knew to have photo identification and proof of citizenship ready to
> hand the inspector it would significantly speed up inspection times.
>
> Milne said that "enhanced identification checking" was part of his
> department's efforts to continually upgrade security at land borders.
"We're
> doing more of what we've always done, trying to utilize all our
> capabilities," he said. "We feel the identification of individuals in a
> vehicle is the best possible way to identify potential terrorists."
>
> Hardy said the new policy directed CBP officers managers to take advantage
> of all resources available. "If you've got a system, use it," he said.
>
> Milne also said there was not a policy to check every traveler all the
time.
> "We pulse it, we vary it," he said. "They're doing it when we think it's
> necessary and they can do it without impacting the line."
> Gordon Rogers with the Whatcom County Council of Governments is not so
sure
> that it's working that way. Returning from an event at the United States
> Consulate in Vancouver last week Rogers said he was struck first by extra
> lanes open on the east side of the Peace Arch port of entry, but then by a
> marked increase in the time it took inspectors to process each vehicle,
> entering data into computer terminals.
>
> Milne said the enhanced inspection increased the average time to inspect
one
> vehicle and its occupants by 50 to 70 percent. "We average about one
minute
> per vehicle on primary," he said. "When we do additional identification
> checks, it adds 30 to 40 seconds."
>
> Rogers wondered how the enhanced identification checks and resulting
> increased delay fit into the framework established under the Security and
> Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America, signed by President George
W.
> Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul
Martin
> March 23, 2005. The accord is a commitment to "make our open societies
safer
> and more secure, our businesses more competitive, and our economies more
> resilient," which Rogers said depends on border practices which do not
> "unduly impede legitimate travel and trade."
>
> Hardy said "every time any of my bosses talk security, they talk
> facilitation." The SPP was one of a number of initiatives his department
> would be implementing. "We're looking at wait times and how to do things
> faster," he said. He indicated the memo his department was not releasing
> listed December 2005 as a target date to install passport document readers
> in primary booths which could speed up identification checks in the
> inspection lane.
>
> Larsen said the next few years would see continual change at the border:
The
> Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative requires all travelers to have
> passports by 2008; the US-VISIT program now being implemented will require
> entry and exit records of all visitors; in 2010 the Olympics coming to
> Vancouver will bring hundreds of thousands of visitors to the area and
> significant highway and border infrastructure projects are scheduled
between
> now and then.
>
>
| 
